Victoria -- I think one Burke is well worth reading: THE LOST
GET-BACK BOOGIE
(I'm sure a number of other people on this list would agree;
I believe this discussion has come up before, in fact). It's
a crime novel, though not part of either of his series,
originally published by LSU Press, I believe. The manuscript
apparently benefited greatly from help from the master
himself, Charles Willeford. The Robicheaux novels (or at
least the two or three that I tried) gave me a headache. The
prose is a little too Wolfean for my tastes.
Later...Kip
Victoria Esposito-Shea <
vmes@northnet.org> on 01/05/2000 10:59:40 AM
Please respond to
rara-avis@icomm.ca
To:
rara-avis@icomm.ca cc: (bcc: Kip Stratton/AUS/NIC)
Subject: RARA-AVIS: Re: You're HOW old? and a few other
comments
>
>Jim Doherty mentioned his belief that most people on
this list were first
>"blown away" by a hard-boiled writer while they were
in high school. I'm
wondering if that is
>true, just as I am wondering if most of you were born
after '58, as
another recent post
>suggested.
Teri,
I joined the list a little over two years ago, and I had the
definite initial impression that I was younger than most of
the people here, and that there were very few women on the
list (I was born in 1970). I was wrong in both cases, as it
turns out, though of course there's a difference between the
demographics of the list "regulars" and of those, like me,
who listen avidly and speak rarely.
As far as beginning to read HB early, I know I did. I went
through the juvenile mysteries pretty young, and when I was
about twelve I picked up my parents' Hammet omnibus, which I
read avidly, and which then led me to more of the classics,
and so on. (I wouldn't trade the early beginning for the
world, though I do think that I'd have a clearer view of
Hammett if I'd started later. As it is, I still re-read with
something of the viewpoint of a twelve-year-old going "Wow!
This is so cool!"--or whatever the phrase was back then.) And
I still read pretty voraciously, which is one reason I didn't
put in a top 5 list--unless the first book I read by an
author really, really sucks, I basically always go through
that author for a while.
Speaking of really, really sucks, I finally got around to
reading James Lee Burke--I'm terrible at titles, but I think
the one I picked up was "A Stained White Radiance." God, it
was awful. I didn't want to hear all that much about his time
in Vietnam, and by the time he got done stacking up the
murdered first wife and the second wife with lupus that's
apparently causing her mental problems and the adopted
refugee child and the incestuous political family with the
abusive father and stepmother, I was just stiing here going,
yeah, so where's the story? Is there a plot here, or is this
just modern Southern Gothic that got out of hand?
Are they all like that? Should I hunt up something earlier,
or is it not worth the time?
Later, Vicky
-- # To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
-- # To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 07 Jan 2000 EST