Next message: Frederick Zackel: "RARA-AVIS: future noir?"
- Previous message: JIM DOHERTY: "RARA-AVIS: Re: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- In reply to: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Next in thread: Steve Novak: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Next in thread: Allan Guthrie: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Reply: Steve Novak: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Reply: James Michael Rogers: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
> --- In rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com, "James Michael Rogers"
> > For instance, even though Faulkner got brought up a bunch last week, it seems we never talk about Sanctuary even though that has got to have been one of the most influential crime novels ever. Without Sanctuary, I don't think there ever would have been a Blue Velvet film.
This is going back a ways, but Sanctuary was discussed quite a bit when we 1930s fiction was a theme for the month. Here's a link to the post I believe kicked off the discussion:
http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/archives/200211/0037.html
Chris
- Next message: Frederick Zackel: "RARA-AVIS: future noir?"
- Previous message: JIM DOHERTY: "RARA-AVIS: Re: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- In reply to: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Next in thread: Steve Novak: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Next in thread: Allan Guthrie: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Reply: Steve Novak: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Reply: James Michael Rogers: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: 23 Jul 2009 EDT