------------I first discovered Ross Macdonald in the 1960's and he immediately became one of my favorite mystery writers. This year I decided to reread a couple of the Lew Archer novels and ended up rereading all 18. I also took breaks rereading Raymond Chandler and Hammett. All three remain my favorite detective authors.
When the comment was made about "preachy", I at first assumed we were talking about John D. Macdonald's Travis Mcgee novels because I find them dated now due to the soapbox elements, etc. Ross Macdonald seldom descended to this level and I even have no problem with his last few novels. I still rank him as one of the big three of detective fiction.
--- On Thu, 1/7/10, jacquesdebierue <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
From: jacquesdebierue <email@example.com>
Subject: RARA-AVIS: Re: Ross MacDonald--the Two Faces
Date: Thursday, January 7, 2010, 12:14 AM
I think Ross Macdonald's fiction evolved, not necessarily the way hardboiled fans would have wanted it to evolve, but it did. I think the books got more and more predictable, though they are all good reads, at least for me. I don't find the later books so much preachy as glum, tired, but still good. He did want to make certain points, that is true. Perhaps he did underline too much. But when I pick up one of those novels, I don't stop, I read it from cover to cover. That's a sign that the author did something right...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 07 Jan 2010 EST