Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir

From: James Michael Rogers (
Date: 24 Jul 2009

  • Next message: Steve Novak: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"

    Thanks for the link. I believe this was while I was off-list.

    I can't remember where I read it, but I seem to recall that Faulkner detested the book and saw it strictly as a commercial move.


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: cptpipes2000
      Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 08:48
      Subject: Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir

    > --- In, "James Michael Rogers"
    > > For instance, even though Faulkner got brought up a bunch last week, it seems we never talk about Sanctuary even though that has got to have been one of the most influential crime novels ever. Without Sanctuary, I don't think there ever would have been a Blue Velvet film.

      This is going back a ways, but Sanctuary was discussed quite a bit when we 1930s fiction was a theme for the month. Here's a link to the post I believe kicked off the discussion:



    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 24 Jul 2009 EDT