Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir

From: Jeff Vorzimmer ( jvorzimmer@austin.rr.com)
Date: 20 May 2007

Next message: William Ahearn: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"

Previous message: Patrick: "Re: RARA-AVIS: No Country for Old Men, the movie"
In reply to: Allan Guthrie: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Next in thread: William Ahearn: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Next in thread: Michael Robison: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Everything's Noir?"
Reply: William Ahearn: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Reply: Allan Guthrie: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Burnett's criminal-as-protagonist LITTLE CAESAR (1929) could be called
> noir,
> and if Caldwell's THE BASTARD (1929) and Wolfson's BODIES ARE DUST
> (1931) aren't noir, I'll eat my underwear.

But are they hardboiled crime novels such as Red Harvest and Little Caesar? I'm asking I've not read either books.

Jeff

Next message: William Ahearn: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Previous message: Patrick: "Re: RARA-AVIS: No Country for Old Men, the movie"
In reply to: Allan Guthrie: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Next in thread: William Ahearn: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Next in thread: Michael Robison: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Everything's Noir?"
Reply: William Ahearn: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Reply: Allan Guthrie: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Early Noir"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 20 May 2007 EDT