Re: RARA-AVIS: 1940's recommendations ?

From: Al Guthrie (
Date: 24 Nov 2002

----- Original Message ----- From: "Robison Michael R CNIN" <>

> I'm looking for some more stuff to read for the 1940's.
> Can anybody tell me anything about the following titles?
> Are they good or bad? Are some of them not hardboiled?
> The Man with the Golden Arm, Algren 1949
> The Neon Wilderness, Algren 1947
> Deadlier Than the Male, Gunn 1942
> Deadly Weapon, Wade Miller 1946
> Stranger in Town, Howard Hunt 1947
> Maelstrom, Hunt 1948
> Bimini Run, Hunt 1949

DEADLY WEAPON was Wade Miller's first book. You can tell. Published in 1946 when the authors, Bill Miller and Bob Wade, were 26 (they were born a month apart), it introduces Atlanta PI Walter James, in his only role. James claims he's "resting" for a while in San Diego, but it transpires, after a murder in a local theatre where he's a member of the audience, that he's following a lead in the shooting of his erstwhile partner, Hal Lantz. It soon becomes apparent that a drugs cartel is to blame, and James embarks on the daunting task of discovering the identity of the mysterious Dr Boone.

This isn't one of Wade Miller's best. Not by some distance. However, there are glimpses of what the authors were capable of. For example, the main love interest is between James and Laura Gilbert. Subtly, Wade Miller gives James feminine characterstics ("Walter James put his hand next to Laura Gilbert's on the desk. It was just as white and almost as small") and just as unsubtly does the reverse with Laura by giving her the male nickname, Kevin (we're told it's her middle name, although it's never explained why). It spices up their relationship, as does the fact that her father might be a crook - he might even be Dr Boone.

However, DEADLY WEAPON is perhaps most interesting for it's similarity in style to THE MALTESE FALCON. Wade Miller uses the same minimalist technique: few emotions or thoughts are supplied by Walter James, the main viewpoint character. Also, I have to confess, I found the final revelation genuinely surprising.

The writing isn't that good. I've mentioned before that Wade Miller has a fondness for juicy verbs. Not so here. And when they do go for it, they often clumsily supply intransitive verbs with objects. Which I found a bit annoying. The ending is confusing and I felt I'd need to re-read the book to get exactly who was who and why they did what they did. But it doesn't deserve a second reading. Not when there are so many books I haven't read.

I'd recommend Miller's next novel, GUILTY BYSTANDER, 1947, which introduces series character, Max Thursday, PI. It is a better example of what Wade Miller can do. It's a better story, too.


# To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to
#  This will not work for the digest version.
# The web pages for the list are at .

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 24 Nov 2002 EST