The book had images of artifacts from the Kinsey Institute
that were in an exhibition at a renowned art museum. I assume
the objection was for sex, but the pictures had already
passed through propriety filters at two museums, and the
quite proper women I know who were stuck with finding
last-minute, fast, high-quality printing didn't find the
artwork objectionable.
Joy, who's seen some really gross stuff in medical books
she's worked on
Mark Sullivan <
DJ-Anonyme@webtv.net> asked: > What was the exhibit
and what did the printers find objectionable? I'm
> assuming it was something visual, not something they
would have had to
> have read the book to find.
>
-- # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 22 Jun 2002 EDT