>Ellroy is the first writer since the 40's to capture
the true meaning of
noir.
>Sorry Marshall but you're out in left field without a
glove let alone a clue.
>hard-boiled marshmallow that you are get with the
program or get out
What's the point in this? Do the insults make your point more
valid? From
where I'm standing they make your point very weak and do not
substantiate
it in the least ... but then, that's what ad hominem will do
to an
argument. Instead of taking the easy way out, how about a
compare and
contrast or analysis with something of substance to support
your point? If
it's true and as obvious as you infer that "Ellroy is the
first writer
since the 40's to capture the true meaning of noir" well then
you should
not have any problem defending your position without
resorting to name
calling. Now, if that's beyond your abilities ... maybe you
should
consider being the one to leave.
----
volente Deo,
Anthony
jackechs@erols.com or ICQ #3717510
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/4640/
"One man is not an island, but one man can
make a difference." Budlight Commercial
#
# To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to
majordomo@icomm.ca.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.