RARA-AVIS: Willeford, Ned and Flames, or why Willeford is the best...

Peter Walker (pw@pw.cablenet.co.uk)
Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:24:08 +0000 Willeford distilled a life times experience into his books and
particularly the Hoke books. What makes them so scary, so real is the
off-hand violence, the sudden casual nature of violence and how it can
change our lives - small act of malice visited on us by people and
situations we have never encountered before. Take Junior Frenger
killing the Hare Krishna by breaking his finger, Troy Ludons comment
that "I'm what the shrinks call a criminal psychopath. What that means
is, I know the difference between right and wrong, but I don't give a
shit", the events surrounding Stanley Sinkiewicz being accused of
molesting a child (the same guy who goes round killing neighbourhood
dogs), the eruption of violence in "The Way We Die Now", all
`everyday' in not just their ordinariness but in the lulling, neutral
way Willeford tells them.

Willeford wrote that "I had a hunch that madness was a predominant
theme and normal condition for Americans living in the second half of
this century". This was about his 1963 paranoid classic, "The Machine
In Ward Eleven" and was over twenty years before he wrote the Hoke
books. Even then he knew what he was saying.

Willeford said n an interview (quoted in Crimetime 9, pg. 36)
that; "A good half of the men you deal with in the Army are
psychopaths. There's a pretty heft overlap between the military
population and the prison population, so I knew plenty of guys like
Junior in `Miami Blues' and Troy in `Sideswipe'...[when they finish
their tour]..they just can't turn it off and go to work n a 7-11. If
you're good with weapons or something in the Army, you're naturally
gonna do something with weapons when you get out, whether it's being
a cop or a criminal".

Willeford's theme - well one of them - is the sexually obsessive man,
the competitive man, the intelligent man who must prove himself better
then others. This is a man who cannot live quietly and is all to real.
He is a man who chooses to do bad and there are many like them.

Willeford is a great writer because he tells his story without
us realising he is doing so. He became critically acclaimed in his
life time and had the respect of his peers. He was just breaking into
the big time when he died. His novels are imperfect but all the time
they showed great improvement. What could have been. The fact that he
wrote for the pulps - and his books were cheap - shouldn't hide this
fact. There was nothing minor about them. Nor, for that matter, have
his books anything to do with `magic realism' - a completely
unconvincing description of anything let alone Willeford. Reality in
abundance but magic implies fantasy or sleight of hand - with
Willeford what you see is what you get.

On a final note: should Ned go? Well, Ned, I've e-mailed you about
what I felt to be an unnecessarily OTT response to my e-mail in which
I questioned your point of view. We should stick to the list rules and
e-mail people direct with our quibbles and not bother the good people
of this list with them. But Ned, you didn't answer my question - if
the Hoke books are `minor' in the genre (whoops, there's that word
again) then which books are `major'? This needs an answer because your
statement "they are minor" implies there is something `major' - or
didn't you intend it to actually make sense?

----------------------------------
Check out the Crimetime web site.
www.crimetime.demon.co.uk/
There's always time for crime
-----------------------------------
#
# To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.