Re: RARA-AVIS: Nathaniel West

From: James Michael Rogers (
Date: 19 Mar 2010

  • Next message: Joy Matkowski: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nathaniel West/Sinclair Lewis"

    To dis Sinclair Lewis is just madness. I wonder where people get these notions?


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: jacquesdebierue
      Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 14:38
      Subject: Re: RARA-AVIS: Nathaniel West


      --- In, "James Michael Rogers" <jeddak5@...> wrote:
    > The list of writers who were still hip to Scott Fitzgerald at the time of his death was pretty short. Along with the unfortunately absent West, I think Dorothy Parker traveled to the funeral. Hemingway, of course, had a very complicated relationship with Fitzgerald. O'Hara was something of an imitator at times as well as a fan and Dashiell Hammett was portrayed as a Fitzgerald enthusiast in a famous anti-Hemingway anecdote by Lillian Hellman. Chandler was something of a fan, though he had misgivings about The Last Tycoon. In short, Fitzgerald appears to have cut a wide swath as far as the HB crowd was concerned even as his rep hit the dumps with the larger public.

      It is amazing that Fitzgerald's rep hit the dumps... it's hard to think of a better writer from that era. West was Fitzgerald's equal, I would say. Tragic loss. Those two were not just writers, they were violinists of the soul.

      Of course, fads have nothing to do with quality. Just the other day somebody told me that Sinclair Lewis was not worth reading -- though the person hadn't actually read him. I told him that Babbitt and Main Street are mindblowing, that if somebody today wrote something as good as that about the present era, it would be a sensation. I doubt it had any effect, but I made the effort.




    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 19 Mar 2010 EDT