I only want to say I wasn't meaning to infer that was the method Brown or
Rowling used. It's just what happened, although I've heard it asserted
Brown was strategic in what he chose to write, but I don't know what the
source was on that claim.
But I don't know that I'll completely say you can't write something you
aren't passionate about and do it well. When I studied journalism we were
told a good writer can write anything, given the facts. A lesser writer
might make it clear they were only in it for the money, but I'm sure there
are authors who are capable of writing outside their preferred genre and
first love and doing extremely well. I know a good handful who started with
sci fi/fantasy intentions but couldn't sell there and switched to crime, and
are extremely successful in this genre, but still have a special passion for
the genre they left behind.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Patrick King <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> A friend, who's worked for years
> in publishing once told me the secret was to figure out what the next
> big thing was before anyone else did and write that book, which
> explains Dan Brown and JK Rowling. Beyond that... well... Who knows?
> It's the $6,000,000 question.
> There in lies the rub. You can spend a buck on a lottery ticket, or you can
> spend three years of your life writing a book you calculate "everybody" is
> going to love.
> I doubt that that was the method Brown or Rowling used to break the mind
> barrier, anymore than it was the method of Ian Fleming, Grace Metslious,
> Margaret Mitchell, or Edgar Rice Burroughs.
> These writers wrote what amused and interested them, and were fortunate to
> be published in such a way as to attract a very large audience. They aimed
> at their own inner core and found something that resonated with many. I
> doubt anyone who has aimed at the audience in a calculating manner has ever
> hit that kind of payday. I've read lots of books that come from that cold,
> professional attitude and they don't resonate. Many people may buy them
> searching for more Harry or more Bond or more Scarlett, but those characters
> aren't there and though the books sell, they fail. Ultimately, a novel is a
> work of art however crudely executed. If one's writing to make millions, the
> lottery ticket is probably going to be less disappointing.
> Patrick King
-- LULLABY FOR THE NAMELESS Dec 09 Dorchester http://www.sandraruttan.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/
<*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/join (Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: email@example.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 13 Mar 2010 EST