RARA-AVIS: Re: are authors the best judge of their work?

From: hardcasecrime (editor@hardcasecrime.com)
Date: 27 Nov 2009

  • Next message: davezeltserman: "RARA-AVIS: Re: are authors the best judge of their work?"

    > If the other two were pretty lousy, why'd you
    > want to reprint them??

    I'd think this would go without saying, but just to state the obvious: I didn't want to reprint those. I wanted to reprint the first one.

    Furst had no interest in allowing any of the three to be reprinted, and he's right about two of them (but wrong about one).

    --Charles

    --- In rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com, "davezeltserman"
    <Dave.Zeltserman@...> wrote:
    >
    > --- In rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com, "hardcasecrime" editor@ wrote:
    > >
    > > There were three: YOUR DAY IN THE BARREL, which was nominated for
    the
    > > Edgar for Best First Novel and was lots of fun, and THE PARIS DROP
    and
    > > THE CARIBBEAN ACCOUNT, which were both pretty lousy.
    > >
    >
    > If the other two were pretty lousy, why'd you want to reprint them??
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 27 Nov 2009 EST