Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Lehane/Stasio on noir

From: David Wilson (boiledoverbooksn@yahoo.com)
Date: 21 Nov 2009

  • Next message: David Wilson: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Lehane/Stasio on noir"

    ________________________________ From: bobav1 <bob.vietrogoski@gmail.com> To: rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com Sent: Fri, November 20, 2009 8:04:28 AM Subject: RARA-AVIS: Re: Lehane/Stasio on noir

      

    It took years for me to accept them, but Jim's broad definitions of noir and hardboiled won me over. In my opinion, other proposed definitions describe sub-categories.

    --- In rara-avis-l@ yahoogroups. com, Patrick King <abrasax93@. ..> wrote:
    >
    > I don't, however, think everyone else is wrong. Just the ones who disagree with me.
    >
    > JIM DOHERTY
    >
    > ************ ********* *******
    >
    > Is there anyone else here besides Jim who thinks that "noir" is defined entirely by "atmosphere" ?
    >
    > Patrick King
    >

     

          

    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 21 Nov 2009 EST