There was no way for me to intervene and get my 200 bucks back, either. So, you're saying because the Amazon thing was all done electronically it was somehow more sinister than my own bank, that holds more than 100,000 of my dollars btw, not only confiscating my $200, but turning me in to the police when they most certainly realized I knew little more where that money came from then they did or I certainly wouldn't have brought it to them.
--- On Tue, 11/17/09, Anthony Dauer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
From: Anthony Dauer <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: state of NY publishing
Date: Tuesday, November 17, 2009, 1:57 PM
I do not believe that is what the original author was seeing as
1984ish ... it was the fact that the technology supported remote
deletion of the any book for any reason without the user's ability to
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Patrick King <abrasax93@yahoo. com> wrote:
> Really? So, why does it seem "1984" when a counterfeit book is discovered,
> confiscated and the money returned to the people who bought it? That
> seems rather a better deal than one gets most places.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 17 Nov 2009 EST