> Well, I said I liked the book. As a matter of fact, I like most of
> P.D. James's books, especially A Taste For Death.
> But I think she is obviously riffing off of the classic cozies of
> the Twenties and Thirties, and doing so in a very literate and
> sometimes moving way. The only book I am familiar with that
> approached HB was Innocent Blood which I also thought was one of her
> least successful efforts.
Well, that sorta proves my point. Although on the surface James and
Hammett may be worlds apart, there's obviously something there that
would allow you to be a fan of both writers. Good writing?
And while James does indeed work in a more traditional, Golden Age
vein, I'm pretty sure some of the viewpoints, characters and crimes in
her work would give some of those twenties and thirties cozy writers
and readers the vapours. Because that era's hard-boiled school
influenced far more than just its most direct descendants (Chandler,
et al). It influenced the entire mystery genre, including of course AN
UNSUITABLE JOB FOR A WOMAN, which focusses on a young female private
eye who, although about as far from Sam Spade as imaginable, still has
to deal with the legacy and expectations of her famous predecessor and
the decidedly masculine hard-boiled school.
Hell, given Hammett's eclectic reading taste, he might have well
recommended something even further afield than P.D. James.
Double hell, I'll bet a lot of us read stuff far beyond the narrow
confines of the hard-boiled and noir sub-genres. In fact, I'll bet
some of us read some seriously strange shit, fiction and non-fiction,
that would give the rest of us the vapours.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 04 Jul 2009 EDT