Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Blurbs (Ignore That Sucking Sound)

Date: 11 Jun 2009

  • Next message: foxbrick: "RARA-AVIS: Archived recordings: Pelecanos on Pacifica Radio, Leonard on NPR today"

    Dear dear, I recall when tough and sometimes personal comments were viewed as evidence of the dark and hardboiled nature of the list, the controversy as attracting interest. Those times are long gone, I know, but of the alternatives, I still prefer "inmates" most as the appellation for list members.

    Peace, love, chocolates and roses, Kerry

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Brian Thornton
      Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:47 PM
      Subject: Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Blurbs (Ignore That Sucking Sound)

      Not wading in to the middle of this tempest-in-a-teapot, just making a
      couple of observations:

      I have followed this thread since its inception, and I am puzzled by the
      reference to Kevin's comments being clearly leveled at anyone (and I say
      this as a friend, mentee, and eternal defender of the literary prowess of
      our man Guthrie) in particular.

      After all, it's an open secret that people blurb books all the time without
      having actually read them ("An action-packed thrill-ride!" "A taut, noirish
      thriller!" How often have we all seen actual variations on this theme?).

      And that I reply: "So what?"

      I think the impact of blurbs is hugely over-estimated by everyone from
      publishers' marketing directors on down the publishing food chain. That
      said, if they help sell a few more books, that's great. If someone is
      willing to lend their name to another author's marketing campaign, I just
      don't see the harm in that.

      I happen to know of an author (not on this list) who is something of a
      mascot to a group of fairly accomplished authors, all of whom he prevailed
      upon to blurb his book. He got positive responses nearly across the board.
      For my money, the book he was peddling was pretty much unreadable. But do I
      begrudge him that small victory? Absolutely not.

      Getting a book deal in this business is tough enough. I have vast respect
      for anyone persistent enough to get one, and that goes for whether or not I
      like their book.

      So far be it from me to rain on their parade if they actually enjoy a bit of
      success as a result. This is one reason that I've refused nearly all
      requests to *review* the work of other authors (either fiction or
      nonfiction). The notable exceptions to this are reviews I've written for
      the work of authors who are far beyond my power to have any sort of impact
      on their careers (one review of THE HUNTER by Richard Stark on Al Guthrie's
      site and one of Ross MacDonald's THE DOOMSTERS on Patty Abbott's site).

      Talking here on Rara Avis doesn't count, for my money. This is just a bunch
      of friends/fellow travelers/inmates sitting around together talking about a
      subject we all seem to love to varying degrees.

      So who cares who blurbs and who doesn't?

      Oh, and secondly, could you guys take this increasingly personal
      back-and-forth off-list, before the outright flames begin to fly? It's been
      a hot summer so far, and I'd hate for anything to go up in smoke!

      All the Best-


      On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:16 PM, davezeltserman <> wrote:

    > --- In <>, Kevin
    > Burton Smith <kvnsmith@...> wrote:
    > >
    > > When I see a blurb, I always hope it's from a legit review or other
    > > source. But too often, it's just a premixed, premeasured endorsement
    > > from one brown noser to another; a circle jerk of thumbs-up. A recent
    > > book I've read featured some pretty nice blurbs from some writers I
    > > respect -- or at least I used to. The book was horrible.
    > >
    > Kevin, you've made it pretty damn clear in your recent posts that the above
    > was meant for myself and Allan Guthrie, and I guess also Bill Crider and Ed
    > Gorman, who have all said positive things about The Disassembled Man. I can
    > only speak for myself, although I'm pretty sure the others feel the same
    > way, that we all saw the same excesses and indulgences that you did, but we
    > also saw real talent in the writing and wanted to support both that and a
    > new writer from a tiny press who was up against it and would be lucky to
    > sell 200 copies. For me what stood out in the book was the absurdest humor
    > when Avicious's mentor/tormentor/devil would appear. But let me ask you,
    > what it the world did you think any of was expecting in return from this new
    > and virtually unknown writer? Do you think a blurb from him would matter to
    > any of us? And if any of us were trying to play the quid pro quid blurb game
    > don't you think we could've picked much higher profile authors??? If you
    > really want to show some balls why don't you start looking at some of the
    > clearly manufactured blurbs on bestsellers? What was that famous quote from
    > Robert Parker when he was asked by an author seeking a blurb whether Parker
    > had read his book yet: "Do you want a blurb or do you want me to read your
    > book, you can't have both"?
    > --Dave

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 11 Jun 2009 EDT