As opposed to "bulls," which is still in limited parlance out here in the
Western hinterlands. Does anyone still hear "Fuzz" used? That one seems to
have died along with "Don't trust anyone over 30" and "Peace, Pot,
Microdot."
Brian
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Patrick King <abrasax93@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In my experience among the criminal element of the northeastern US, New
> York to Boston, the term "pig" is still firmly in place with regard to law
> enforcement, federal or local.
>
> Patrick King
>
> --- On Sun, 3/8/09, BaxDeal@aol.com <BaxDeal%40aol.com> <BaxDeal@aol.com<BaxDeal%40aol.com>>
> wrote:
> From: BaxDeal@aol.com <BaxDeal%40aol.com> <BaxDeal@aol.com<BaxDeal%40aol.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: The Horsemen
> To: rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com <rara-avis-l%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 8:02 PM
>
> In a message dated 3/8/09 4:50:07 PM, jacquesdebierue@ yahoo.com writes:
>
> > > while I certainly don't know it for a fact, I wouldn't be surprised if
>
> > said
>
> > > police force refers to themselves by such. beats the hell out of "the
>
>
> > pigs",
>
> > > which is how I thought of the police for decades. whaddaya gonna
> do.
>
> > child
>
> > > of the 60s, yanno?
>
> >
>
> > But the pigs don't refer to themselves as such, an important difference
> (I
>
> > don't know anything about the horsemen of Canada).
>
> >
>
> most of the men and women in rank and file policework these days are too
>
> young to even remember that counter culture reference to their profession
>
> John Lau
>
> ************ **
>
> Check all of your email inboxes from anywhere on the
>
> web. Try the new Email Toolbar now!
>
> (http://toolbar. aol.com/mail/ download. html?ncid= txtlnkusdown0000 0027)
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 09 Mar 2009 EDT