--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "jacquesdebierue"
<jacquesdebierue@...> wrote: In my opinion, L'Amour has 3 worthwhile westerns that should be read
(Hondo, Sitka, Burning Hills). I gave up on his Sackett plot repeats decades ago and probably didn't buy another of his until the C & Graf Hills of Homicide came out, collecting most of the stories I had in pulp form but hadn't yet read. There are still a few I haven't read; they are so-so, readable but pretty much run-of-the-mill stories that would normally be buried in the pulps never to be collected or anthologized for a less well-welling author.
--My backbone western authors since I started reading in the 1950's were and are Luke Short and Ernest Haycox(the short novels and novelettes collected/published after their deaths should not be where you start reading on them, as they are lesser works). I recommend Robert MacLeod(4 of his novels, but not Muleskinner), all Don Hamilton's westerns(esp. Big Valley, Man from Santa Clara(2-shoot gun) ), and Loren Estleman's City of Widows and Stranglers. I have trouble enjoying recent non-Murduck series Estleman westerns except these 2. Ken
> Thanks. I'm curious about this and will try to grab it as soon as
> possible. I have always liked L'Amour's work. I know some people think
> of him as a hack, but I have a lot of respect for him. In any case,
> I've enjoyed everything I've read by him, including a few stories in
> anthologies. Do Raravians favor westerns? Years ago I consumed a large
> number of them, with no regrets or bad aftereffects... I reached a
> point at which I couldn't find very many new authors that I liked.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 19 Nov 2008 EST