Manson, at 22, had already led an "institutional" life, so
that's a bit late. (& when we all have price tags on our
head it'll be time to find a new land)
----- Original Message ---- From: Patrick King <
abrasax93@yahoo.com> To:
rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008
12:57:57 PM Subject: Re: RARA-AVIS: Maltese Falcon
--- jacquesdebierue <jacquesdebierue@ yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Not so cosmetic. The idea of being mere
merchandise
> is unimaginable to
> us fortunate enough not to have been slaves.
The
> slaves couldn't
> emigrate, as the starving populations of
many
> countries have
> traditionally done when the going got really
rough
> because of war,
> famine, brutal regimes, pogroms and so
on.
************ ********* ********* ********* ********* **** Of
course I'm using hyperbole. Nonetheless, it's easy to see why
the underemployed in the US join gangs rather than work the
lousy jobs available to them. The gang life leads to prison,
another form of slavery. The court system is a bureaucracy so
extenuating circumstances do not apply. At the age of 22,
Charles Manson was sentenced to 10 years in prison for
stealing a $46 federal check. It was a FEDERAL check so the
maximum penalty applied. At least 7 lives would have been
saved if a program had been in place to re-educate and
re-introduce Manson to society. It would have been no more
expensive than keeping him in prison. Or maybe they should
have just killed him for the $46. Lives would have been saved
including those of the victims he conned into committing
murder none of whom are psychotic today.
Patrick King
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 23 May 2008 EDT