I am amazed by the level at which I am being willfully
misunderstood here -- it's`getting downright pissy, folks.
The point is not the emoticons or the avatars or the other
window dressing which some of you seem so worked up about.
The point is precisely the ability to organize the
**content** in the ways that are most helpful and interesting
to you, the individual (including the ability to easily
screen out content you don't give a fig about).
I'm concerned about some people's reading skills if they are
not getting that from my multiple posts today.
Mark
On 2/18/08, Jeff Vorzimmer <
jvorzimmer@austin.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > That would require more ambition than I possess
at this point. :) And
> I
> > *like* this group -- I see no need to rival it,
but it should not get
> > stuck
> > in what is rapidly becoming the technological
past. That was why I
> raised
> > these points.
>
> You're talking to a bunch of guys who are pretty
much rooted in the last
> century and only just got off the IBM Selectrics.
This here is whiz bang
> technolgy as far as we're concerned. We don't need
no stinking smily
> faces.
> We don't need cocktails with little friggn' Japanese
umbrellas to keep us
> interested. We're here strickly for the
content.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
-- Mark R. Harris 2122 W. Russet Court #8 Appleton WI 54914 (920) 470-9855 brokerharris@gmail.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 18 Feb 2008 EST