Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake

• Next message: Richard Moore: "RARA-AVIS: Re: Tie-ins and such"

• Previous message: Allan Guthrie: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: The definition of literature"
• In reply to: Nathan Cain: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake"
• Next in thread: Patrick King: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake"
• Next in thread: Ed Lynskey: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Tie-ins and such"
• Reply: Patrick King: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--- Nathan Cain < IndieCrime@gmail.com> wrote:

> Whatever you do, don't watch the movie adaptation.

No kidding. Not only a bad adaptation of Chandler, it transcends the genre and becomes a bad movie on its own. Poor Ray, he never did a decent film version of his work with the exception of Altman's The Long Goodbye.

William

Essays and Ramblings
<http://www.williamahearn.com>

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

• Next message: Richard Moore: "RARA-AVIS: Re: Tie-ins and such"
• Previous message: Allan Guthrie: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: The definition of literature"
• In reply to: Nathan Cain: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake"
• Next in thread: Patrick King: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake"
• Next in thread: Ed Lynskey: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Tie-ins and such"
• Reply: Patrick King: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06 Nov 2007 EST