Re: RARA-AVIS: Tie-ins and such

• Next message: Curt Purcell: "RARA-AVIS: Re: The definition of literature"

• Previous message: Nathan Cain: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake"
• In reply to: Juri Nummelin: "RARA-AVIS: Tie-ins and such"
• Next in thread: Richard Moore: "RARA-AVIS: Re: Tie-ins and such"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--- Juri Nummelin < juri.nummelin@pp.inet.fi> wrote:
> I think, though, that Ed's original question was about
> TV-related tie-ins, not tie-ins generally.

Thanks for all the background on tie-ins. Good stuff. I just wondered about the inception of TV tie-ins. I mean when did TVs first go on the market? Early 1950s? And I know not all families had one (too expensive, etc.). I believe our family's first TV
(1958?) was a cast-off with a crappy picture when it worked at all. It's interesting how the pulp writers adapted to write the TV tie-ins. I haven't read many, if any, and thought it might be an enjoyable way to read more work by our favorite pulpsters like Gil Brewer.

Ed

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

• Next message: Curt Purcell: "RARA-AVIS: Re: The definition of literature"
• Previous message: Nathan Cain: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Chandler's The Lady in the Lake"
• In reply to: Juri Nummelin: "RARA-AVIS: Tie-ins and such"
• Next in thread: Richard Moore: "RARA-AVIS: Re: Tie-ins and such"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06 Nov 2007 EST