RE: RARA-AVIS: Encyclopedia of Pulp Fiction Writers

From: Jess Nevins (
Date: 11 Oct 2007

-----Original Message-----
>From: "Alan K. Rode" <>
>I think Lee's introduction speaks for itself. Also: a book title, more often
>than not, is what a publisher believes what will allow the house to sell
>books rather than a precise content identifier. This practice tends to be
>extremely noticeable with non-fiction.

True, but both writer and publisher need to be careful when they phrase their title, so as to not mislead both the general public and the specialists in the field. When you use the word "encyclopedia" you implicitly lay claim to exhaustiveness, and when you use the phrase "pulp fiction writers" you implicitly claim you are going to be covering writers of pulp fiction. If you aren't exhaustive and end up covering many writers whose work didn't appear in the pulps, while neglecting prominent writers whose work did appear in the pulps, you'd better have a very good explanation and put it at the beginning of your introduction, not tucked away in one sentence at the end of a long history of pulps and pulpish fiction.

Jess Nevins, author of the Encyclopedia of Fantastic Victoriana
(in the introduction to which I addressed the exhaustiveness issue) and the forthcoming Encyclopedia of Pulp Heroes (in the introduction to which I address both the exhaustiveness issue and the "pulp heroes" issue).

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 11 Oct 2007 EDT