*Correction
It seems you're implying that anything that's NOT noir must
be "cosy" -- a label that I'm resisting because it's so often
used dismissively
--- In
rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com, "caroli1975"
<karabair@...> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by 'cosiness' -- would
that be
> psychological distance, and lack of aggressiveness?
It seems you're
> implying that anything that's noir must be "cosy" --
a label that I'm
> resisting because it's so often used dismissively. I
don't think that
> the mainstream UK police procedural (represented
here by James,
> Rendell, and in a slightly off-center sense, by
Hill) is cosy by any
> stretch of the imagination. They all delve into dark
corners of
> psychology, they have protagonists constantly worn
down by the things
> they encounter, and contain plenty of other aspects
that make the
> writing more than superficial. Like I said, they're
not noir, but
> that's a categorization, rather than a value
judgment.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06 Jul 2007 EDT