At least some fresh air in this cinema controversy …
I totally second Mr T in his opinion on
Tarantino.
Since years, I spread my own similar opinion
about this joker as film maker…
Mr Tarantino just make a voluntarily confusion
between caricature of a genre and the genre itself. His films
are mere acrobatic pastiches treated as parody of the
genre…
He does not even understand why some films by
others were great.
He just tries to master the camera in his empty
pastiches: all in visual aggression, nothing in substance. He
is the killer of genre movie.
At best he is just an Americanized version of
Claude Lelouch (French master of unnecessary filming effects
applied to empty stories at best, to conventionally ridicule
developments most of the time). Of course Tarantino played
the same game on other grounds: his territory is noir films
heritage, violence and popcorn teenagers films. All this to
make his painstaking parodies. Certainly not neo-noir. Just
neo-junk. With budgets.
I had no time to jump in the conversation when it
was still on, but I wanted to support the clairvoyance of Mr
T.
E.Borgers
HARD-BOILED MYSTERIES
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/6384
Jacques Debierue <
matrxtech@yahoo.com> a 飲it :
I don't think Tarantino is very good. I would go so far as to
say he is not even good. If he has shown any originality, I
have missed it.
>
>
Influenced by Tarantino? That is not a very good
recommendation.
MrT
---------------------------------
D飯uvrez une nouvelle fa篮 d'obtenir des r鰯nses ࠴outes
vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et
des exp鲩ences des internautes sur Yahoo!
Questions/R鰯nses.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 05 Jul 2007 EDT