Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: Has anyone changed noir writing (lately)?

Date: 20 Mar 2007

John wrote:

"Never thought I'd be writing a defence of post-modernism, but I think it's important to distinguish between work which is self consciously post-modern and makes sure we realise it by referencing classics of modernism - e.g .James Sallis's work - and stuff that just happens to be postmodern because life is pretty postmodern - e.g. most post Tarantino crime fiction set in a world in which life copies the Sopranos and vice versa. It's a distinction that may be easier to understand if you look at music. There's plenty of intellectual postmodern art-rock and there's also hip hop which is utterly postmodern - in that it takes an established art form, dismantles it and puts it back together in a new fashion, while providing a self-referential commentary - but rarely avowedly intellectual."

I agree. I'd also say it's important to make a distinction between postmodern works, self-conscious or otherwise, and postmodern criticism. You can read and appreciate works by Sallis, O'Connell or Lethem without ever having heard of, much less read, Lyotard, Foucault or Baudrillard.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 20 Mar 2007 EDT