Re: RARA-AVIS: Re:Art and Morality

From: Robert Elkin (
Date: 25 Feb 2007

--- wrote [{that} Jim wrote]:
> "Dimitri Gat's NEVSKY'S DEMON, by way of contrast,
> is not immoral because it argues for a hateful
> ideology, but because the author plagiarized

I don't think one could say legitimately that the plagiarism here makes the book "immoral"; if it did, one would have to first accept that the neutral concept of "art" itself is subservient to that of private property, and that doesn't work at all. R

____________________________________________________________________________________ Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 25 Feb 2007 EST