From: Steve Novak ( Cinefrog@comcast.net)
Date: 11 Feb 2007

Fine, we are all superbly moral and dandy...can we move on please....this discussion is becoming utterly as useless and vacuous as Nascar on a rainy day.... a French post-office stike...or a rabbit stew sans red wine...

Steve Novak Cinefrog@comcast.net

On 2/11/07 3:47 PM, "jimdohertyjr" < jimdohertyjr@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I don't make a startlingly difficult-to-see logical jump. I look at
> the movie, in conjunction with Altman's public comments, and come to
> the obvious conclusion. But we're beyond that now.
> You may disagree with the position that, morally, an adapter owes some
> fidelity to the originator of the source material. But what Miker said
> is that artists have no moral obligations, at least not in the creation
> of their art.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 12 Feb 2007 EST