Not at all! Ryan O'Neil, Kris Kristopherson, Robert Redford
etc were the romatic leads of that era. Gould is a character
actor, and a damned good one, but never a likely leading
man.
Patrick King
---
BaxDeal@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 2/3/07 2:07:21 PM,
>
abrasax93@yahoo.com writes:
>
>
> > DJ wrote:
> > And that's another reason why I don't buy it
that
> > this was supposed to change Gould's image --
from
> > what, to what?
> > *****************
> > From a character actor to a leading man a
la
> Bogart
> > and Mitchum.
> >
>
> in 1973, at the tail end of the 60's
> counter-culture, Elliott Gould WAS what
> was considered a leading man in that era.
leading
> men a la Bogart and
> Mitchum were a thing of the past
>
> John Lau
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have
been
> removed]
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers
Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 08 Feb 2007 EST