RARA-AVIS: Burden of Proof

From: Michael Robison ( miker_zspider@yahoo.com)
Date: 12 Nov 2005


Mark wrote:

I don't think courts had the same burden of proof in the 1930s. Nor did the cops have the same constraints on eliciting confessions.

************* That's true. Nevertheless, I thought that Brigid's confession to the police would be how Spade revealed to her that he killed Archer because of some deal gone sour in their partnership.

The way I remember it, the motive that Hammett contrived for Brigid to kill Archer was about as thin as the walls at the Red Roof Inn. I might use this as an excuse to reread the book. It's been a while.

miker

        
                
__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/kqIolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
  Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rara-avis-l/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     rara-avis-l-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 12 Nov 2005 EST