>My problem with the theory is Al puts forth in
>novel is that it depends on too many people to be
>participants in the conspiracy of silence, including
>people Al himself credits with being persons of high
>integrity who gave no evidence in other aspects of
>their lives of being willing to keep quiet while an
>innocent man was executed.
Not speaking to that case specifically, but given even recent
history in places like Illinois and Oklahoma, it doesn't
always seem to require a huge conspiracy for an innocent man
to be sentenced to die (or even merely be convicted) -- more
a combination of overzealous prosecution, incompetent
counsel, misleading (or dishonest) witnesses, vested
interests, ulterior motives, corner cutting, bad luck and
other tragic errors and occurrences.
Is that what happened in the Lindbergh case?
Who knows? But it sure seemed plausible at the time I read
it. And Collins isn't the one who raised the doubts about
Hauptmann's guilt. Those have been around for decades.
And yes, Jack's Shamus-nominated MUNCHIES is on TD in the
fiction section for those of you who'd like to read it for
Kevin -- # Plain ASCII text only, please. Anything else won't show up. # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # email@example.com. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 22 Jun 2004 EDT