David:
I just finished "Fearless Jones." You might give it a whirl.
I loved it. It might change your mind about Moseley. I agree
with you about Sara Paretsky, for what it's worth.
All the Best,
Brian
>
>
>
>
>
>
tieresias@att.net wrote:
>
> > > I haven't discovered a new American writer
I've been really excited about in
> > > ten years (when I simultaneously happened
upon Cormac McCarthy and James
> > > Ellroy). But, then again, if Leonard or
Ellroy don't deserve to win a
> > >Nobel, who in America really
does?
> >
> > Two words: Walter Moseley.
> >
>
> I haven't ventured too very deeply into his work. I
read "Devil in a Blue
> Dress"
> a long time ago because everyone always crows about
it, and then "A Red Death"
> shortly afterward. I hated them both, though. Then I
saw the movie for "Always
> Outnumbered, Always Outgunned," which I liked better
than the Rawlins stuff,
> mostly because it's not trying too hard to be a
mystery (I don't know how
> closely
> it follows the book though; I hated the Denzel
Washington "Devil"). About two
> months ago I figured I'd give Mosley another
shot--I'm generous that way--and
> try
> one of the later Easy Rawlins books, so I read the
short story collection, "Six
> Easy Pieces." Surprise, surprise, I disliked that
one too, although I liked it
> better than either of the previous two books of his
that I'd read.
>
> He'd be a much better writer if he stopped forcing
mysteries into his stories.
> He
> writes bad mysteries, I think, pretty tepid stuff;
the kind of painfully
> four-square Chandler knockoffs that people have been
doing to death (and doing
> it
> better) for decades. What does interest me in his
novels are the oddly
> bourgeois
> dreams and aspirations Easy Rawlins has. On the one
hand, he's this negro
> counterculture type (not by any kind of hippie-ness,
but by virtue of his race
> in
> a racist society), with the genre's requisite
dislike for authority...on the
> other
> hand all he really wants to do is own property and
be a landlord. That's
> something you don't see in mysteries every day...or
in "straight" fiction for
> that
> matter.
>
> My general take on him is that he's an ambitious
(points there) but not terribly
> talented writer who has some perverse fascination
for a genre that cripples
> everything that IS good about his writing. I tend to
think of him as part of
> that
> wave of 1980s mystery/crime writers who got (and
still get) a lot of press as
> previously excluded minorities "redefining" the
genre (cf. Sara Paretsky, whom I
> like even less than Mosley).
>
> Also, like Sara P., I find Mosley gratingly,
stupidly, almost poisonously
> liberal. Paretsky's much worse with her dopey
diatribes, but Mosley is a pretty
> serious offender too. And I'm one who considers
himself pretty far on the left,
> too.
>
> David Moran
>
> --
> # Plain ASCII text only, please. Anything else won't
show up.
> # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say
"unsubscribe rara-avis" to
> # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the
digest version.
> # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
.
-- # Plain ASCII text only, please. Anything else won't show up. # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 22 Jan 2004 EST