I think it's Etienne Chaumetton...but I'm at the office and
can't check immediately...anyway you are perfectly correct it
is now of historical interest and has validity when checking
the origins of the terminology...if one is interested in the
discussion: is Noir, a genre vs is Noir a
movement...ect...etc...and I think this discussion is mostly
irrelevant nowadays but.... the book is interesting and worth
savoring in that historical respect...
> From:
DJ-Anonyme@webtv.net (Mark Sullivan)
> Reply-To:
rara-avis@icomm.ca
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 23:34:22 -0400
(EDT)
> To:
rara-avis@icomm.ca
> Subject: Re: RARA-AVIS: Noir Films
>
> While checking out the noir titles published by City
Lights, I ran
> across their recently reprinting of the translation
of "A Panorama of
> American Film Noir (1941-1953)" by Raymond Borde and
Etienne Chanmelon.
> The write-up claims it was the first book length
analysis of film noir.
> Has anyone read it? Is it of more than historical
interest?
>
> Mark
>
> --
> # Plain ASCII text only, please. Anything else won't
show up.
> # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say
"unsubscribe rara-avis" to
> # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the
digest version.
> # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
.
-- # Plain ASCII text only, please. Anything else won't show up. # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 22 Aug 2003 EDT