Re: RARA-AVIS: Re: RARA-AVIS Digest V5 #54

Date: 22 Feb 2003


Re your question below:

> OK, but the problem about adding in
> > any B&W crime (suspense, mystery, detective,
> > call it what you will) film
> which - by the way - I would happily accept, is that
> it does imply an
> essential plot element which somebody or other was
> arguing fervently
> against a few digests ago.

I spoke to this point a few posts ago, but, when this discussion first began, I said that film noir was (and now I'm quoting from memory ". . . a crime film with a particular visual style." From that point on, I thought "crime film" was implicit.

Moreover, given the general subject of this list,
"crime film" would seem to be implicit.

When I resisted the notion that "content" was an essential component, it was in the sense that there was such a thing as a "noir" story or script that would always (if actually produced) be a FILM noir regardless of the visual style.


__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more

# To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to
#  This will not work for the digest version.
# The web pages for the list are at .

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 22 Feb 2003 EST