> I agree with Rene--
>
> Citizen Kane has a definite noir style, but
the
> content is not noir.
>
> Great movie.
>
> Jack
This might be a chicken or the egg question, but isn't it
possible that "Citizen Kane" influenced noir film-makers?
After all, look at "The Maltese Falcon", which came out in
1941, the same year. Stylistically they're similar, although
Welles took more chances in his rookie endeavor with camera
angles, etc., than Huston did (also in his rookie endeavor as
a director), and let's face it, "Citizen Kane" is a nexus
point in film-making. *Everyone* who came after was
influenced by
"Kane" in one way or another, even if it was to resist
Welles' influence. Truly a seminal work for the film industry
in general, and for noir in particular, I'd say.
This is not say that "Citizen Kane" is "the greatest film
ever made" (although in my considered opinion, it is), per
se. Merely that it was incredibly influential over all. It is
possible to be influential and not in a good way, after
all.
Take "The Matrix" for example. Innovative fight scenes? Yes.
"Good" fight scenes? Not in my opinion. The action is too
frenetic, scripted and video-gamish to be something that I
can watch without wanting to fast-forward through it. But
coupled with "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon"(one of the
*stupidest* movies I have ever seen),
"The Matrix" has influenced everything that came after.
It's one reason I would rather rent action movies than see
them in the theatres nowadays. I can fast forward through the
flying across rooftops and speeded-up film processes.
Just my four cents (as I weighed in on other topics as
well),
Brian
-- # To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 17 Feb 2003 EST