Re: RARA-AVIS: Guides Mea culpa

From: Anthony Dauer (
Date: 30 Jul 2001

No apology necessary. You'd think on this list alone we'd have had enough examples of erronious assumptions that we'd stop making them without any basis in reality. I should have posted sooner, I assumed there was a perfectly reasonable explanation as there typically is and not a negative one.

----- Original Message ----- From: John Williams Sent: Monday, 30 July, 2001 8:15 AM

> Oh lord, it is time to come clean on this one. The reason the St James
> has no entry on Willeford is because the idiot commissioned to write it
> (i.e. me) missed his deadline. So heap all further calumny in my direction
> (with maybe just a soupcon reserved for whoever it was decided to go ahead
> and print the thing anyway rather than give me a reminder).

# To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to
#  This will not work for the digest version.
# The web pages for the list are at .

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 30 Jul 2001 EDT