a.n.smith (ansmith@netdoor.com)
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 06:49:35 -0600
> Hardboiled is an attitude, not a style or a genre.
There are genres
within it,
> or types, like the hardboiled private eye story. But
it really depends on
what
> you'll let past the doorkeeper.
It's a combination. Most hardboiled writing has been
associated with the crime genre, but I'm in complete
agreement with you that we find it in literary writing as
well. I'm not interested in locking it in place--which is why
I thought that asking what is "truly hardboiled" shows
someone who must think there is a strict formula.
I'm working on an article comparing Jean Rhys to Hammett. She
wasn't a crime writer, but her attitude and worldview seems
hardboiled to me. The early novels, where the lead is always
a single woman involved with married men, dangerous men,
one-night-stands, and lots of alcohol. She had a nice writing
style, much more stark than the modernist Europeans at the
time, certainly sharing quite a lot with Hammett and Chandler
and Cain's prose.
So I can agree that it is an attitude, but not one that
demands a particular characterization or set of standards.
And I do think style has a lot to do with it, since that's
the prose and the language working there. Regardless of all
the great literary writers who fall into the hardboiled
category, my favorites are still the ones who write about
crime.
Neil Smith
-- # To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Wed 01 Dec 1999 - 07:51:52 EST