Re: RARA-AVIS: Hard-boiled vs. soft


Juri Nummelin (jurnum@utu.fi)
Fri, 5 Nov 1999 11:55:58 +0200 (EET)


On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Doug Bassett wrote:

> though, I've always blamed the "sensitive" PI trend on
> two authors: Robert Parker (with all of that "what it
> means to be a man and still have a committed
> relationship" stuff), and, I hate to say it because I
> really admire his writing generally, Lawrence Block. I
> think it's undeniable that his Matthew Scudder series
> has taken a nose-dive in quality ever since Scudder
> got sober and domesticated.

I agree completely with that. Robert B. Parker and Block are at their worst almost unbearable (Block is much better in Tanner novels). In such books as they aim to write there is no need to tell about the protagonist's attempts to survive in their everyday life. It just isn't interesting. And same goes for Howard Engel and Marcia Muller.

And I've always wondered why Matt Scudder and Spenser and Mark Timlin's PI (I forget the name) always take time to tell what they wear. In the beginning of "The Big Sleep" Marlowe tells what he wears, but it tells us about the character and the mood he's in and how he fits in the landscape, not just about what he wears. And at least he wears a suit and not sneakers and jeans! I think a PI must wear a suit!

And I think it's not funny anymore if a PI has problems paying his bills and stuff. Stuart M. Kaminsky's novels about Toby Peters are larded with Peters's fussying about the dirty clothes and unpaid bills and dyspepsia. What's the point?

Juri jurnum@utu.fi

--
# To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to # To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Fri 05 Nov 1999 - 04:56:37 EST