Re: Re: RARA-AVIS: noir vs hardboiled

David White (dpwhite@eden.rutgers.edu)
Mon, 7 Dec 1998 18:25:55 -0500 (EST) wow, "it should be yours too..." the end all be all... yikes... anyway I
agree I suppose, I'm afraid to disagree...

-Dave

On Mon, 7 Dec 1998 BaxDeal@aol.com wrote:

> while I agree with the general assessment of hard-boiled being an attitude, I
> don't feel as many here do that it has to necessarily involve
> institutionalized corruption.
>
> and while noir certainly reflects a visual style in film, the French refered
> to the genre as "black" more for its nihilistic philosophy rather than because
> most of works of the original era were filmed in black and white.
> specifically, noir reflects the view that we are all doomed. therefore, a
> novel, which has no visual style to speak of, can certainly be both hardboiled
> and noir. if the characters (particularly the protagonist) has enough mental
> and emotional toughness, it qualifies as hardboiled. and if no matter how he
> or she strives, he or she is fucked in the end, the story is noir.
>
> that's my opinion and it should be yours too.
>
> John Lau
> #
> # To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca.
> # The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.
>

#
# To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.