RARA-AVIS: Wrong? Moi?

Tom Sweeney (sweeneyt@nh.ultranet.com)
Mon, 01 Sep 1997 15:47:42 -0700 > One thing I think
>that Tom is maybe wrong about is his generalization about length. Going
>back to Chandler and Hammett (which I guess isn't really fair), one
>remembers that they wrote some long stories that were pretty strong.

Very true. What I meant to say was that in reading the AHMMs of twn-thirty
years ago, I found the shorter stories much better in the hard-boiled arena.
The longer stories, in AHMM of that era, the onger stories were almost
always gentler stories of involved character sketches with little or no
external conflict. Now, of course, though I still read and enjoy AHMM and
EQMM, I can't find anything resembling tough, direct action.

I didn't mean that long stories had to be character-driven. Sorry if I
implied it.

I recently bought THE MIDNIGHT RAYMOND CHANDLER because it contains the
short "Blackmailers Don't Shoot", which I hadn't read. The huge book also
contains the essay "The Simple Art of Murder", in which Chnadler says, "As I
look back on my own stories it would be absurd if I did not wish they had
been better. But if they had been much better they would not have been
published." Wel, maybe that's why I have a hard time finding stories I like.
If they could only be so good in the pulp days, no wonder I can't get them
today.

BTW, right after my last post, in which I said that even Hardboiled Magazine
is tending toward characterization, I received Issue 23. The first thing I
did was read two excellent stories. The Spillane, of course, but also a good
story by A. E. Holliday. Both great. It's a good issue overall, except

>
>Some talk of movies this week. I saw one last week that's a fun period
>piece of sorts, and well in the genre: _SHAFT_(1971?) It also raises, I
>think, that earlier topic of "social critique" in the hard-boiled. The
>film nods at, then backs away from, issues of drugs, Black nationalism,
>etc. In the end, you're all right if you wear slick clothes, have a
>cool pad, etc.
>
>Best,
>Doug Levin
>#
># To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca.
># The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of RARA-AVIS Digest V2 #26
>******************************
>
>#
># To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis-digest" to
># majordomo@icomm.ca.
># The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.
>
>

#
# To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.