Re: RARA-AVIS: Parker's Procedurals, Westerns, and Their Film Adaptations

From: rrandisi@sbcglobal.net
Date: 01 Mar 2010

  • Next message: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Parker's Procedurals, Westerns, and Their Film Adaptations"

    I really loved the first four Spenser books. After that it was hit-and-miss. I haven't read his westerns, but I do like the Jesse Stone books.

    RJR

    --- In rara-avis-l@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jeter <michael.damian.jeter@...> wrote:
    >
    > For me, _Early Autumn_ ranks as one of my favorite reads, perhaps
    > because it reflects a great deal of my personal life: a son raised by
    > a father who, for one reason or another, did not teach him the things
    > that men know, what Raymond Carver described as "the places to fish."
    >
    > As a man who has always questioned and second guessed himself, I like
    > the man who, sure of himself, can help others. Yes, that help might
    > include solving a crime, but it goes to something deeper: a way to
    > live, to look at the world, as the cold gutless place in which we
    > live, and still see the slivers of light and warmth: friendship, love,
    > honor.
    >
    >
    > I realize these are just the things that irritate many, and I think
    > that's fine - not that you are irritated, but that in the vast sea of
    > detective fiction, no one author fits every reader. I have many fine
    > novelists left to read, and I do not argue that Parker is the
    > greatest, or anything of the sort. I do not pretend any authority
    > except this: I know what I like.
    >
    > On 3/1/10, Stephen Burridge <stephen.burridge@...> wrote:
    > > As a casual reader of Parker's work, I read several Spenser novels back in
    > > the 1980s. The only one I really remember is the the one in which Spenser
    > > acts as father to a boy, which recent discussion leads me to believe must
    > > have been "Early Autumn". It struck me as unusual and interesting at the
    > > time; however I didn't read any more Parker until fairly recently, when I
    > > picked up "Hundred-Dollar Baby", as the best bet among a limited selection
    > > of paperbacks in a drugstore. As I recall I enjoyed aspects of the book, it
    > > seemed professional and smooth and I was initially pulled in to the story,
    > > but in the end there was too much of the contrived and sentimental about
    > > it. Most recently, I got a couple of the books for this Rara-Avis month,
    > > "The Godwulf Manuscript" and another one whose title I forget and which I
    > > have yet to read. (The blurb says it's the one in which Spenser's sidekick
    > > Hawk is introduced.) I really liked the '70s period detail of "The Godwulf
    > > Manuscript" (then contemporary, of course) and I thought the wisecracking
    > > was at a pretty high level; it was an entertaining read. A comparison that
    > > came to mind was "The Rockford Files", the first season of which I've been
    > > watching and enjoying. Both of course are enthusiasms of Kevin Burton
    > > Smith, of this list, and I wouldn't be watching Rockford if it weren't for
    > > his advocacy, for which I thank him.
    > >
    > > So there it is, not much to it, more impressions of a relative newbie, as
    > > are so many of my postings to this list. At this point my semi-informed
    > > view of Parker is that he was a smart and capable pro whose stuff can
    > > probably be counted upon to entertain, but not, for me, a
    > > particularly exciting or interesting writer.
    > >
    > >
    > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Michael Damian Jeter
    > New Orleans, LA
    > Literacy, Music, and Democracy
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 01 Mar 2010 EST