Next message: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Previous message: Mark Sullivan: "RE: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- In reply to: Jeff Vorzimmer: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Next in thread: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Next in thread: Mark Sullivan: "RE: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Reply: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Dear lord spare us from these sorts of prerequisites!
(and I'm not slamming the notion of Jim Thompson as required reading, just
the notion of reading any author's entire canon as a prerequesite for
participation in a discussion group with a subject area as broad as that of
Rara Avis)
Brian
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Jeff Vorzimmer <jvorzimmer@austin.rr.com>wrote:
>
>
> . . . said a man who's read everything by Jim Thompson, which should
> be a prerequisite to belonging to the list.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Next message: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Previous message: Mark Sullivan: "RE: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- In reply to: Jeff Vorzimmer: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Next in thread: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Next in thread: Mark Sullivan: "RE: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Reply: jacquesdebierue: "Re: RARA-AVIS: Nag, Nag, Nag Noir"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: 22 Jul 2009 EDT