This "knowledge" discussion is bordering on the
* one can write about anything, anywhere, anyway...it has nothing to do with "knowledge", writing is writing...
* what is this notion of "knowledge": where does knowledge starts, where does it end...research, experience, to be "informed"...are only part of whatever "knowledge" is????
* there are several layers/levels of "reading": so independently of whatever one put into one's writing, it can be "read" in other ways, on other fronts, at other levels...so the discussion of "the knowledge" of the writer is, no matter what, totally moot...
...and these are only some of the questions raised by this,
I can't remember if this discussion span out of Vachss's, but
I can tell you that he displays vast amounts of "knowledge"
about old vintage US cars at the start of Two Trains
Running...I don't know if any is accurate, I assume...but it
doesn't matter anyway...it's the way it is written which is
interesting...and unfortunately in this case, it comes as
another worn-out cliche in what turns out to be a very
uninteresting book ...and I'm dropping it right
Montois disappointed by TTR
RARA-AVIS home page: http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 17 Jan 2006 EST