Re: RARA-AVIS: Philo Vance: how many eggs?

From: James Rogers ( jetan@ionet.net)
Date: 15 Sep 2000


    The Phil Vance books are silly fun, as cozies often can be. But they are about as close to the antithesis of harboiled as one can come.

                                                        James

-----Original Message----- From: William Denton < buff@pobox.com> To: RARA-AVIS < rara-avis@icomm.ca> Date: Thursday, September 14, 2000 9:41 PM Subject: RARA-AVIS: Philo Vance: how many eggs?

>Hi,
>
>I picked up one of S.S. Van Dine's Philo Vance mysteries tonight, because
>that series has a lot of footnotes in it, and I like novels with footnotes
>(I have a list on my web site of the ones I know about, if anyone's
>interested). On the back cover, it says, "S.S. Van Dine was the
>forerunner of the modern hard-boiled school of mystery novelists." I've
>never heard this claim before. Is there anything in it, or is it just a
>bunch of malarkey? I always figured Vance was in the fey Ellery Queen
>vein (although Inspector Queen is a hard case).
>
>
>Bill
>--
>William Denton : Toronto, Canada : http://www.miskatonic.org/ : Caveat
lector.
>
>--
># To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to
># majordomo@icomm.ca. This will not work for the digest version.
># The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .
>

--
# To unsubscribe from the regular list, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to
# majordomo@icomm.ca.  This will not work for the digest version.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 15 Sep 2000 EDT