Re: RARA-AVIS: procedural

From: Anthony Dauer ( anthony.dauer@erols.com)
Date: 19 Apr 2000


Primarily, however, I think the definitive answer is though that the work is technically correct and specific as far as the procedures involved ... like Tom Clancy and the technical details in his works ... so a coroner, EMS, fireman, DA, etc., could be the point of view or even the criminal as long as the detail of the work is the police procedure.

Charles Shafer wrote:

> Talking about police procedurals. Would it be safe to say they're written
> solely from the cop's point of view?

--
volente Deo,

Anthony Dauer Alexandria, Virginia
Practice random acts of Xeroxing!

-- # To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca. # The web pages for the list are at http://www.miskatonic.org/rara-avis/ .



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 19 Apr 2000 EDT