Re: RARA-AVIS: Willeford vs. Leonard

Mario Taboada (matrxtech@sprintmail.com)
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 22:19:26 +0000 I think the similarity between Leonard and Willeford is in some respects
superficial. While Leonard always writes realistically both in plot and
in characterization, a lot of Willeford is just plain fantastic. Think
of his masterpiece, "The Burnt Orange Hseresy". It could have been
written by Borges or Bioy Casares (in fact, it is strongly reminiscent
of some of the latter master's novels). Leonard's literary provenance
can be more likely be traced to the work of John O'Hara and Ernest
Hemingway.

What they share, in my opinion, is that they are both supervirtuoso
natural writers, who are interesting no matter what they write about and
who never force themselves on the reader by gimmicks; this all too rare
virtuosity and spontaneity is what makes them so unique. They also exude
real knowledge of the real world, and in spades.

For an experiment, try picking up an ordinary mystery (even a good
conventional one) after reading, say, Willeford's "Miami Blues" or
Leonard's "Freaky Deaky" or "The Moonshine War". What happens to me in
this situation is that I very quickly put aside the book. The great
pianist Artur Schnabel once said that two composers can excel on
different planes of achievement - but that the planes remain different.
In the cases of Willeford and Leonard, we have examples of the highest
plane in the crime novel.

In case you are wondering, I am a fan of these two gentlemen.

Regards,

Mario Taboada
#
# To unsubscribe, say "unsubscribe rara-avis" to majordomo@icomm.ca.
# The web pages for the list are at http://www.vex.net/~buff/rara-avis/.